McArthur Abstract Frequent advances in medical technologies have brought fonh many innovative treatments that allow medical teams to treal many patients with grave illness and serious trauma who would have died only a few years earlier. These changes have given some patients a second chance at life, but for others. Instead of dying relatively painlessly, these unfortunate patients often suffer from painful tenninal illnesses or exist in a comatose state that robs them of their dignity, since they cannot survive without advanced and often dehumanizing forms of treatment. Due to many of these concerns, euthanasia has become a central issue in medical ethics.
Hire Writer It beats logic that for physicians to propose and participate in the administration of euthanasia, they have evaluated the propensity of life against the suffering of the patient and resolved that assisted death is the most appropriate approach to relieving the sick from prolonged suffering Cavan, Euthanasia relieves patients from long-standing pain but puts the value of life at a compromise in which doctors and family members with unreliable permission from the patient resolve to terminate the life Church of England, It is important to ensure adequate medical and professional safeguards to ensure that euthanasia is wrongfully exploited or denied for patients suffering from terminal illnesses.
The discussion about the use of euthanasia in medical set up attracts moral, ethical and logical arguments. For morals, the act of deliberately ending the patients life irrespective of the health condition is wrong due to the sanctity of life.
Argument Analysis: Euthanasia and the Right to Die Essay; Argument Analysis: Euthanasia and the Right to Die Essay There are two types of euthanasia: active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a person painlessly. to the elderly suffering from terminal illnesses, suicide pervades. This can be seen to align with current law regarding passive voluntary euthanasia, as patients with terminal illnesses have the right to refuse treatment based on these same criteria (Australian Human Rights Commission, ). Active Euthanasia: is the one which causes immediate death of the patient, by the direct and deliberate action of the physician. For example when a lethal injection is given to the patient or an overdose of a pain killer when the physician knows the after effects of such a dose.
They also argue that the ability of a sick to endure suffering and pain during sickness confers on them some sense of dignity which would be denied if euthanasia was to be used Cavan, Besides, anti-euthanasia group posit that if legislations that legalize euthanasia are formulated and enforced, then it would offer the first step on a slippery slope in which the chances of the sick living are limited and premature termination of life becomes a quick choice instead of palliative care Jans, Though it is clear that euthanasia is only an option in cases where available technologies, medicine, and professional expertise cannot be effective in relieving a terminally ill patient from suffering, its critics castigate it as an unethical decision Church of England, Nonetheless, this school of thought argues that in aiding the patients death, the doctor usurps the patients choice to live which is a falsity.
All medical euthanasia are administered after consensual consultations with the patients family and the patient himself. The administration of euthanasia for terminal illnesses patients is commonly accomplished through either withdrawing the life supporting treatment or administering pain-relievers in lethal dosages or both.
Best medical practice requires that doctors execute the termination of life after discussing it with the patients and their family members and arriving at a consensus. This agreement not only upholds the value attached to life and patients right to die but also prevents excessive suffering which results in reduced value attached to life.
In medicine, the value that patient attaches to life plays a critical role in ensuring proper healing and effectiveness of treatments Pappas, In most cases, patients who are subjected to euthanasia are first provided with adequate counseling so that they can make informed choices that uphold the value of life.
In addition, the patients are adequately educated under palliative care hence their acceptance of death as a source of relief is triggered by pain, a desire to preserve personal dignity, the autonomy of thought and attainment of pleasure in life.
In reality, the contemporary medical technologies have made remarkable improvements in prolonging the lives of patients and enhancing wellness for the old people. For instance, respirators can assist patients with breathing or lung problems to live longer and maintain the normal physiological processes associated with it Cavan, Nonetheless, these technologies have only managed to alleviate the pain for patients with cases such as accidents Church of England, Nonetheless, the use of technology in terminal illnesses is only a way of prolonging the suffering of sick people without a probability of recovering.
Within this context, the only thing that technology and anti-euthanasia advocacy do for a terminally ill person is to subject him to more pain and agony. The debate over the right to die. A contribution to the euthanasia debate. Until the end willed by god? How to cite this page Choose cite format:Argument Analysis: Euthanasia and the Right to Die Essay; Argument Analysis: Euthanasia and the Right to Die Essay There are two types of euthanasia: active euthanasia and passive euthanasia.
Active euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a person painlessly. to the elderly suffering from terminal illnesses, suicide pervades. Euthanasia for Patients Suffering from Terminal Illnesses In virtually all civilizations across the world, the serenity of life is a significant consideration.
The high value attached to life is the reason for various advancements in medical technologies that ensure good health and increase longevity. Passive euthanasia is the withdrawing or withholding of a patient’s life-sustaining medication and active defined as the act of purposely bringing someone to their deaths.
Through years of debate and criticism over methods of euthanasia, it has been concluded in the medical profession that the acts of euthanasia should be beneficial. Euthanasia for Patients Suffering from Terminal Illnesses.
to ensure adequate medical and professional safeguards to ensure that euthanasia is wrongfully exploited or denied for patients suffering from terminal illnesses.
The administration of euthanasia for terminal illnesses patients is commonly accomplished through either . In his essay “Active and Passive Euthanasia” James Rachels argues that active euthanasia should be avoided only to satisfy the law, not because of any perceived moral difference between active and passive.
It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from this hardship, even if that relief is.
Euthanasia is a word derived from Greek language which means “easy death” and is defines as the practice that allow one to intentionally ends ones life and relieve from extreme pain and suffering because of terminal illnesses.